In the world of health care, consent plays an important role. There are two main types of consent—express and implied.
Implied consent deals with situations involving inferred permission, while express consent involves overt permission. Consent is an integral component of medical treatment and procedures.
It helps validate the patient-healthcare provider relationship and reinforces respect for individual autonomy and the decision-making rights of patients.
The topic of consent becomes extremely important during medical malpractice claim investigations.
Read on to learn more about each type and the difference between express and implied consent in New Mexico. If you have questions, please contact our New Mexico medical malpractice lawyers today.
Key Takeaways
- Implied vs. Express Consent – In healthcare, consent is essential. Implied consent infers from a patient’s actions, like rolling up a sleeve for a flu shot. Express consent requires clear verbal or written agreement, especially for major procedures.
- Why It Matters in Medical Malpractice Cases – Consent plays a critical role in medical malpractice claims, as disputes often arise over whether a patient fully agreed to a procedure or treatment.
- Protecting Patient Rights – Knowing the difference between implied and express consent helps ensure patients make informed decisions while also safeguarding healthcare providers from legal issues.
What Is Implied Consent in Medical Terms?
Implied consent occurs when a patient passively cooperates in a process without verbal or written consent. This often applies in routine medical procedures where patient actions, such as extending an arm for a blood draw, indicate agreement. Implied consent is legally recognized in many healthcare settings for non-invasive treatments.
Implied consent to medical treatment typically arises in situations where a minor requires urgent medical attention, and their parent or legal guardian is unavailable to provide consent. This often occurs in cases of life-threatening injuries, where immediate medical intervention is necessary to preserve the child’s health and well-being. In such instances, healthcare providers may proceed with treatment based on the assumption of implied consent, prioritizing the child’s welfare in the absence of explicit authorization from a parent or guardian.
Implied consent is understood from a specific situation’s context, actions, or facts and circumstances. Implied consent happens all the time in a medical setting, especially when visiting a doctor’s office.
When a patient visits a doctor for a general checkup and sits down for the exam, it’s a form of implied consent.
When you show up for a flu shot and begin rolling up your sleeve or go to the lab for blood work, it’s implied consent.
The principle behind implied consent is that a patient’s cooperation with basic health assessment and non-invasive procedures indicates their agreement.
The law assumes consent when a person cannot provide it. Implied consent also applies to minors needing emergency medical care when a parent or guardian is unavailable.
However, it’s crucial to understand that implied consent doesn’t apply universally to medical procedures.
The gravity of the procedure and its associated risks can necessitate a more formal and explicit form of consent, referred to as express consent.
What Is Express Consent?
Expressed permission or consent clearly states agreement to a treatment or procedure. It is typically given in writing, but verbal consent may be acceptable in emergencies.
The process of obtaining express consent involves the health care provider explaining the proposed medical intervention in detail, including the nature, purpose, potential benefits, potential risks, and available alternatives.
After understanding these aspects, the patient either verbally agrees to the proposed intervention or signs a written consent form.
Consent ensures patients make well-informed decisions. Express consent can help protect medical providers against false allegations of medical malpractice.
Call us about your case so one of our attorneys at Poulos & Coates can get to work. Call now at 575-523-4444
The Difference Between Express Consent vs Implied Consent
The most significant difference between express and implied consent rests in the level of patient understanding and involvement in the decision-making process.
Express consent, conversely, involves a direct, clear line of communication between the health care provider and the patient.
Securing express consent also ensures that the patient has had ample opportunity to ask questions, contemplate the implications, and then decide with complete knowledge.
Express and implied consent are both fundamental in health care. They reflect a patient’s right to autonomy, dignity, and active participation in health decisions.
Contact a New Mexico Medical Malpractice Lawyer
Do you have questions about what implied consent is or suspect you’re the victim of medical malpractice? If so, please get in touch with the experienced legal team at Poulos & Coates.
We are one of only two firms in the state with a lawyer who is also a licensed medical doctor working on every case. Our firm also has a nurse on staff who can assist with your case.
With over 70 years of combined legal experience, we have the skills and knowledge to represent you in any medical malpractice claim.
Contact us to schedule an initial consultation with our office to learn how we can help.
Victor Poulos
Vic Poulos & Greig Coates became law partners in April of 2002, when the two medical malpractice litigators merged their offices, combining what is now over seventy years of litigation experience, to form Poulos & Coates, LLP. Licensed to practice before all State Courts of Texas, New Mexico, Iowa, and Kansas. Licensed to practice before the United States District Courts of Kansas, Iowa, New Mexico, and Texas (Western, Eastern, Southern, and Northern Districts of Texas), as well as the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the U.X. Ax Court.
Rate this Post
Loading...